The latest reckless coup attempt – like the Russian Collusion hoax – is just more blatant projection

ramirez-anotherHoax4impeach 

Yesterday I heard a radio (WJR-Detroit) reporter quoting Donald Trump’s comments about the Left’s latest attempt to undo the 2016 election. In a mocking tone (Elliot Francis-Fox News), informed the listeners that the term the president used to characterize the Democrats’ pack of unfounded allegations and illegitimate impeachment proceedings – “coup” – was defined as a takeover by military force. Ha-ha, obviously Trump is just an ignorant buffoon.
 
Never mind that the actual dictionary definition is “a brilliantly executed stratagem; a sudden overthrow of a government by a group of persons in, or previously in, positions of authority, in deliberate violation of constitutional forms.”
 
But such is the woeful quality of mainstream media types. This guy was either clueless himself, or just contemptuous of his listeners, assuming they were too uneducated to know any better.
 
That’s exactly what the Left is betting on with this latest scam they’re trying to run. That the rubes are so gullible they’ll buy everything the Democrats and their media puppets are shoveling.
 
Except, their schemes and machinations are becoming increasingly desperate, their accusations more far-fetched, and so they’re growing less and less convincing all the time. For those of us who see through their web of deceit – and for anyone else who wants the truth – here’s an excellent recap of Trump’s non-crimes, contrasted with the Left’s real crimes. Everything they’re accusing the president of, they’ve already done – in spades ~

The Ukraine Sleight-of-Hand ~ Or, if you prefer, “Soft Coup, Part Deux” ~
 
Donald Trump must be impeached because he put a sensitive transcript onto a secure government server … as he had done often before. Yet Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put our most sensitive secrets on a non-government server. And that is not a crime. In fact, when Congress came looking for those emails, she deleted 30,000 of them … and destroyed the devices. And that is not a crime.
 
President Obama let her. He winked at the FBI and said, “Oh, she didn’t intend to harm national security.” “There are secrets and then there are secrets.” And that was not obstruction of justice. (State Department is finally getting around to investigating those who emailed with Hillary, after years of Obama’s State Department stonewalling.)
 
President Trump started putting transcripts in a secure location after his calls with foreign leaders were getting leaked to the press. Yet, he should be impeached after a distorted interpretation of his Ukraine call is leaked to the press. With, according to the ICIG, “some indicia of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate.” (ICIG is the Intelligence Community Inspector General.)
 
The “Favor”
 
President Trump must be impeached for asking Ukraine to “do a favor.” A “favor”? That sounds bad — as the Democrats and the media report it. But what did the president do? All he did was ask for help with finding out more about Ukraine’s (admitted) connection to the effort by the IC community and Obama administration to sabotage his campaign and presidency. For actually doing what they accuse him of doing.
 
Based on a report of a call leaked by a member of the intelligence community. Who only heard of it second and third-hand. Right as the intelligence community changed long-standing rules to allow hearsay in whistleblower complaints. No, that’s not the least bit suspicious.
 
President Trump must be impeached because he asked a foreign country to look into activities that a former vice president publicly bragged about. The same activities — and pattern of behavior — Politico and Washington Post and New York Times also found suspicious.
 
Ryan Fournier put it wisely: “The democrats want to impeach the president for trying to expose a crime, then elect the person who committed the crime.” […]
 

Absurdity
 
Adam Schiff thinks the President’s call to the Ukraine is so damning, so clearly impeachable, that rather than read the actual transcript, he concocted a complete fiction to read before an official House hearing.
 
In fact, after getting wind of the whistleblower (assuming they weren’t already in kahoots) Schiff sent a staffer to Ukraine to investigate. … on the dime of something called Atlantic Counsel’s Eurasia Center. And who do they get funding from? George Soro’s Open Society Initiative for Europe. (See Rising Serpent’s thread outlining the connections to Soros and Crowdstrike here.) The prosecutor Biden had fired happened to be investigating Soros as well. And that case, too, was buried.
 
Former National Security Adviser and serial unmasker Susan Rice rips the President for securing the transcript … before being forced to admit Obama did the same darn thing. (Speaking of Rice, why is Trump facing impeachment for running his mouth, but Obama didn’t face impeachment for running weapons to Islamists in Libya and Syria?) […]

 
Now Hillary’s Weighing In. Hillary Clinton!
 
The still-bitter Hillary Clinton wants Trump impeached. The same woman who got tossed off the Watergate investigation for her duplicity. Same woman who was an indicted co-conspirator in the Whitewater scandal. Same woman who ran point in trying to destroy the Lewinsky investigation and the Clinton impeachment effort. “Vast right-wing conspiracy,” anyone? […]
 
Clinton’s foundation pocketed hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign interests with business before the State Department. According to the Associated Press, she handed out special access to her office to those who contributed to her foundation.
 
According to the Washington Post, the Clintons forced Kazakhstan to sell their uranium mineral rights to her pal Frank Giustra. His company became Uranium One. He promptly pledged hundreds of millions to the Clinton Foundation.
 
And when Vladimir Putin wanted to buy Uranium One to the point of bribing and extorting energy officials and having his surrogates pump $145 million into the Clinton operation, Obama not only agreed to the sale, his DOJ sandbagged the prosecution. And then threatened the FBI informant from speaking to Congress. […]
 
According to Andrew McCabe, Attorney General Loretta Lynch blocked the FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Yet, the current Attorney General needs to resign or recuse because Trump mentioned him in a phone call.
 
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are the John and James of Saul Alinsky disciples. Alinsky wrote “blame your enemies for what you yourself are doing.” They and their cohorts are still at it.

 
Read the whole piece HERE. Share it with your favorite confused leftie.

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Related:

Oops – it was the OTHER candidate colluding with the Russians…

Karl Marx: “Accuse Your Enemy Of What You Are Doing, As You Are Doing It To Create Confusion”

Did The Inspector General’s Office Help The ‘Whistleblower’ Try To Frame Trump? ~

To fully grasp the depths of the deception and duplicity, however, requires a familiarity with the governing whistleblower laws. Once those laws are understood, the latest attempt by the Deep State to take down our duly elected president become even more obvious. It also becomes clear that the “whistleblower” was not acting alone, and members of the intelligence community inspector general’s office were likely providing an assist in the attempt to bury Trump. So here’s your lawsplainer.

For starters ~

The whistleblower knew the ICWPA (Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998) didn’t apply—and he didn’t care.

This entry was posted in Mendacity, MSM Malpractice, Unvarnished. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *