Historical ignorance: hazardous to the civil society

We know that facts don’t much matter to the Ferguson race hustlers. But if their merry mobs of malcontents had, at some point in their education, acquired a more comprehensive knowledge of history, they may not be so easily duped into following the likes of Reverend Al, so easily swayed by that destructive, divisive rhetoric.
 
Perhaps, as Larry Elder points out in this recent article at Human Events, if they had learned about accomplished Americans like Booker T. Washington, they wouldn’t be so quick to jump on the “Hands-Up-Don’t-Shoot” bandwagon ~

Booker T. Washington was born a slave. In his autobiography, “Up From Slavery,” written in 1901 — just a mere 36 years after the Civil War — Washington wrote:
 
BookerTWashington“As a rule, not only did the members of my race entertain no feelings of bitterness against the whites before and during the war, but there are many instances of Negroes tenderly caring for their former masters and mistresses who for some reason have become poor and dependent since the war. I know of instances where the former masters of slaves have for years been supplied with money by their former slaves to keep them from suffering. … One sends him a little coffee or sugar, another a little meat, and so on. Nothing that the coloured people possess is too good for the son of ‘old Mars’ Tom,’ who will perhaps never be permitted to suffer while any remain on the place who knew directly or indirectly of ‘old Mars’ Tom.’…
 
“From some things that I have said one may get the idea that some of the slaves did not want freedom. This is not true. I have never seen one who did not want to be free, or one who would return to slavery.
 
“I pity from the bottom of my heart any nation or body of people that is so unfortunate as to get entangled in the net of slavery. I have long since ceased to cherish any spirit of bitterness against the Southern white people on account of the enslavement of my race. No one section of our country was wholly responsible for its introduction, and, besides, it was recognized and protected for years by the General Government. Having once got its tentacles fastened on to the economic and social life of the Republic, it was no easy matter for the country to relieve itself of the institution. Then, when we rid ourselves of prejudice, or racial feeling, and look facts in the face, we must acknowledge that, notwithstanding the cruelty and moral wrong of slavery, the ten million Negroes inhabiting this country, who themselves or whose ancestors went through the school of American slavery, are in a stronger and more hopeful condition, materially, intellectually, morally, and religiously, than is true of an equal number of black people in any other portion of the globe. …
 
“This I say, not to justify slavery — on the other hand, I condemn it as an institution, as we all know that in America it was established for selfish and financial reasons, and not from a missionary motive — but to call attention to a fact, and to show how Providence so often uses men and institutions to accomplish a purpose.”

 
America, her history, and her people are far from perfect. But by focusing on isolated incidents of racism, pretending they’re the rule and not exceptions, and distorting the truth, professional antagonists like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have elevated grievance-mongering to an art form. And to what end?
 
Dwelling on the flaws, picking at old wounds, ignoring all the good this country has done and the difficulties we’ve overcome… is tearing the country apart. A national tragedy, based on falsehoods – and ignorance.

This entry was posted in Fruits of Their Labors, Unvarnished. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to: Historical ignorance: hazardous to the civil society

  1. Pingback: Designs on the Truth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *